|
ARCHIVED ENTRIES FOR
SEPTEMBER 2007 |
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Far be
it from me to stint my well-deserved admiration for the network of
sewers which conveyed the sewage of the city into the Tiber.
The sewers of Rome were begun in the sixth century BC and
continually extended and improved under the republic and under the
empire. The cloacae were conceived, carried out, and
kept up on so grandiose a scale that in certain places a wagon laden
with hay could drive through them with ease; and Agrippa, who
perhaps did more than any man to increase their efficiency and
wholesomeness by diverting the overflow of the aqueducts into them
through seven channels, had no difficulty in travelling their entire
length by boat. They were so solidly constructed that the
mouth of the largest, as well as the oldest of them, the Colaca
Maxima, the central collector for all the others from the Forum to
the foot of the Aventine, can still be seen opening into the river
at the level of the Ponte Rotto. Its semicircular arch, five
metres in diameter, is as perfect today as in the days of the kings
to whom it is attributed. Its patinated, tufa voussoirs have
triumphantly defied the passage of twenty-five hundred years.
It is a masterpiece in which the enterprise and patience of the
Roman people collaborated with the long experience won by the
Etruscans in the drainage of their marshes; and, such as it it has
come down to us, it does honour to antiquity. But it cannot be
denied that the ancients, though they were courageous enough to
undertake it, and patient enough to carry it through, were not
skilful enough to utilise it as we would have done in their place.
They did not turn it to full account for securing a cleanly town or
ensuring the health and decency of the inhabitants.
--Daily
Life in Ancient Rome by Jerome Carcopino (tr. E.O. Lorimer)
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
He used
the British Council library. There one day--he wasn't looking
for it--he found the mahatma's autobiography, in the English
translation by the mahatma's secretary.
The
sweet, simple narrative swept him along. He wished to go on
and on, to swallow the book whole, short chapter after short
chapter; but very soon he was nagged by many things, already only
half remembered, already without clear sequence, that he had read
with speed; and (as Sarojini had said) he had often to go back, to
read the easy words more slowly, to take in the extraordinary things
the writer had been saying in his very calm way. A book
(especially in the beginning) about shame, ignorance, incompetence:
a whole chain of memories that would have darkened or twisted
another life, memories that Willie himself (or Willie's poor father,
as Willie thought) would have wished to take to the grave, but which
the courage of this simple confession, arrived at by heaven knows
what painful ways, made harmless, almost part of folk memory, in
which every man of the country might see himself.
--Magic
Seeds by V.S. Naipaul
[N.B.:
It's always dangerous--or, in the case of the discredited New
Critics, heretical--to read an author's life into his fiction, but
one is more than tempted with respect to this excerpt.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
The
origination of medusas is a puzzle to science. Their place in
the evolutionary scale is a mystery. Their task in the great
balance of life is a secret. For they belong to that weird
netherworld of unbiological beings, salient members of which are the
chimera, the unicorn, the sphinx, the werewolf, and the hound of the
hedges and the sea serpent. An unbiological order, I call it,
because it obeys none of the natural laws of hereditary and
environmental change, pays no attention to the survival of the
fittest, positively sneers at any attempt on the part of man to work
out a rational life cycle, is possibly immortal, unquestionably
immoral, evidences anabolism but not katabolism, ruts, spawns, and
breeds but does not reproduce, lays no eggs, builds no nests, seeks
but does not find, wanders but does not rest. Nor does it toil
or spin. The members of this order are the animals the Lord of
the Hebrews did not create to grace His Eden; they are not among the
products of the six days' labor. These are the sports, the
offthrows, of the universe instead of the species; these are the
weird children of the lust of the spheres.
--The
Circus of Dr. Lao by Charles G. Finney
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Lamar
was embarrassed again. But Jack insisted that yes, Lamar was
indeed worthy and must now prepare himself for acceptance into the
brotherhood. Lamar did so. First came the Night of the
Figs, then the Dark Night of Utter Silence. On the third
night, a wintry night, in Room 8 of the Hotel Davos, Lamar Jimmerson
folded his arms across his chest and spoke to Jack the ancient words
from Atlantis--Tell me, my friend, how is bread made?--and
with much trembling became an Initiate in the Gnomon Society.
--Masters
of Atlantis by Charles Portis
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
For
kids like myself social life was represented by the shop-front and
the gas-lamp. This was mainly because we could rarely bring
other kids home in the evenings; the houses were too small, and
after the fathers came home from work, children became a nuisance.
Besides, most families had something to hide; if it wasn't an old
grandmother like mine or a father who drank, it was how little they
had to eat. This was always a matter of extreme delicacy, and
the ultimate of snobbery was expressed for us by the loud woman up
the road who was supposed to call her son in from play with:
"Tommy, come it to your teas, toast and two eggs!"
--An
Only Child by Frank O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
The
multitudes remained plunged in ignorance of the simplest economic
facts, and their leaders, seeking their votes, did not dare to
undeceive them. The newspapers, after their fashion, reflected
and emphasised the prevailing opinions. Few voices were raised
to explain that payment of reparations can only be made by services
or by the physical transportation of goods in wagons across land
frontiers or in ships across salt water; or that when these goods
arrive in the demanding countries they dislocate the local industry
except in very primitive or rigorously-controlled societies.
In practice, as even the Russians have now learned, the only way of
pillaging a defeated nation is to cart away any movables which are
wanted, and to drive off a portion of its manhood as permanent or
temporary slaves. But the profit gained from such processes
bears no relation to the cost of the war. No one in great
authority had the wit, ascendancy, or detachment from public folly
to declare these fundamental, brutal facts to the electorates; nor
would anyone have been believed in he had. The triumphant
Allies continued to assert that they would squeeze Germany 'till the
pips squeaked'.
--The
Gathering Storm by Winston S. Churchill
[N.B.:
The above excerpt concerns the crippling war reparations imposed on
a defeated Germany after World War One (then, the Great War, though,
fairly early in the Twenties, prescient commentators were already
referring to it as the First World War). Of course,
ironically, the crippling of one great power led to the crippling of
many others--otherwise known as the Great Depression. I chose
the above excerpt to give a sense of Churchill's felicitous style
and powers of concision. Churchill "wrote" six volumes
concerning the Second World War but only the first two are mostly
his personal work (as opposed to the mere editing, sometimes heavy,
sometimes not, which Churchill did with respect to the subsequent
volumes). He is a singular modern man of letters--a great
prose stylist who also commanded the levers of power in his own
country of Great Britain. Certainly, the United States has
Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln (not to mention the Founding
Fathers) and France, de Gaulle, all of whom are vigorous and
valuable writers, but one must cast back all the way to the Roman
Empire, and the emperor Tacitus, to find another man of power who
was also one of the great, lasting writers of wisdom. In any
event, only someone who is comfortable commanding a country would
start a six-volume series with this "moral of the work":
In War: Resolution
In Defeat: Defiance
In Victory: Magnanimity
In Peace: Goodwill
Oh, and
for the curious, Churchill also devised a "theme" for each volume of
his monumental study. For The Gathering Storm he
succinctly encapsulates the 600-some-odd pages thus:
How the English-Speaking Peoples
Through Their Unwisdom
Carelessness and Good Nature
Allowed the Wicked
To Rearm
No
beating around the bush there! And with that introduction, Mr.
Churchill launches into one of the best ripping yarns of all time.
In terms of color and veracity, he stands shoulder to shoulder with
Herodotus, an apt, although not entirely flattering, comparison.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
It was,
as you may suppose, in thoughtful mood that I made my way through
London's thoroughfares. I was reading a novel of suspense the
other day in which the heroine, having experienced a sock in the eye
or two, was said to be lost in a maze of mumbling thoughts, and that
description would have fitted me like the paper on the wall.
--Much
Obliged, Jeeves by P.G. Wodehouse
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
I had
thought I had shaken off the pelt of my far past yet here was
evidence that it would not be entirely sloughed, but was dragging
along behind me, still attached by a thread or two of dried slime.
--Shroud
by John Banville
Puff
the Magic Maslin
One
trait I admire in book reviewers is reliability. Janet Maslin
has it in spades. If there's a cliché--like the one in the
last sentence--she'll smooth over the shopworn edges that make the
turn or phrase memorable and, while still retaining the basic
notion, refashion the tired banality into a unique creation of
Maslin's own which, while appearing erudite, signifies nothing--just
like modern art criticism. Such skill requires years and years
of dedicated labor and one can but gape at Ms. Maslin's mastery.
Today's New York Times offers another of her master classes in
gourmet puffery. The book under
review is Ann Patchett's Run. As is true for most
of the books and authors Ms. Maslin extols, I must issue my standard
disclaimer that I have not read the book under review, or, indeed,
any of the other works of the author being praised. I am,
however, familiar with the type of books Ms. Patchett parturiates
and must risk the scorn of reviewers unborn who shall mock me for so
brazenly snubbing one of the leading literary lights of our age--or
not.
Ms.
Maslin begins her puff pastry by asking us to admire Ms. Patchett's
"silken agility." From this, Ms. Patchett, "without
apparent effort . . . glides through time." Then, after
stirred thoroughly by "juxtaposing wildly different characters
creating volatile chemistry among them" do not make the beginning
chef's mistake of confusing Ms. Patchett's creation with that of
"the workaday fiction of Ann Packer, with whom Ann Patchett should
not be confused." Ann Packer! That gives the puff away
doesn't it? Next we'll be told not to confuse Ms. Patchett
with Ms. Danielle Steel. In any event, the puff is cooked to
perfection by ending with the observation that Run "still
shimmers with its author's rarefied eloquence, and with the deep
resonance of her insights." I don't know about you, but I'm
licking my chops (or, in Maslin-speak, shimmering with intellectual
anticipation) at the prospect of further ventures into Ms. Maslin's
own deep resonance of insights.
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
AUTHOR'S NOTE: Not only are all characters and scenes in this
book entirely fictitious; most of the technical, medical, and
psychological data are too. My working maxim here has been as
follows: I may not know much about science but I know what I like.
--Dead
Babies by Martin Amis
[N.B.:
Take that, Tom Wolfe! And all the rest of ye squinty-eyed
scribblers and pompous pontificators. The irony is that Amis's
latest book, The House of Meetings (which I recommend on the
bar to your immediate left) contains a bibliography--just like
Norman Mailer's
latest attempt to top himself in lowering himself--representing
the kind of authorial quasi-scientific, queasy-scholarotic
machinations that Dead Babies spurns. The mind reels at
what the young Amis would think of the middle-aged Amis. Not
much, I suspect.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
A warm
devotion to l'élocution
francaise is easy enough to understand; but Frederick's devotion
was much more than warm; it was so absorbing and so intense that if
left him no rest until, by hook or by crook, by supplication, or by
trickery, or by paying down hard cash, he had obtained the close and
constant proximity of--what?--of a man whom he himself described as
a 'singe'
and a 'scélérat,'
a man of base soul and despicable character. And Frederick
appears to see nothing surprising in this. He takes it quite
as a matter of course that he should be, not merely willing, but
delighted to run all the risks involved by Voltaire's undoubted
roguery, so long as he can be sure of benefiting from Voltaire's no
less undoubted mastery of French versification. This is
certainly strange; but the explanation of it lies in the
extraordinary vogue--a vogue, indeed, so extraordinary that it is
very difficult for the modern reader to realise it--enjoyed
throughout Europe by French culture and literature during the middle
years of the eighteenth century. Frederic was merely an
extreme instance of a universal fact. Like all Germans of any
education, he habitually wrote and spoke in French; like every lady
and gentleman from Naples to Edinburgh, his life was regulated by
the social conventions of France; like every amateur of letters from
Madrid to St. Petersburg, his whole conception of literary taste,
his whole standard of literary values, was French. To him, as
to the vast majority of his contemporaries, the very essence of
civilisation was concentrated in French literature, and especially
in French poetry; and French poetry meant to him, as to his
contemporaries, that particular kind of French poetry which had come
into fashion at the court of Louis XIV. For this curious creed
was as narrow as it was all-pervading. The
Grand Siécle was the
Church Infallible; and it was heresy to doubt the Gospel of
Boileau.
--Voltaire
and Frederick from Books and Characters by Lytton
Strachey
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
For in
a literary career there was one unfailing advantage: no degree
whatever of moral or social disgrace could disqualify one from
practice--and indeed a bad character, if suitably tricked out for
presentation, might win one helpful publicity. It wouldn't
even matter if one went to prison. The abdication was final:
by becoming a writer one bade farewell at once to ethical restraint
and to any kind of conventional status in society.
--The
World of Simon Raven by Simon Raven
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
With a
wild whimsiness, he now used his coffin for a sea-chest; and
emptying into it his canvas bag of clothes, set them in order there.
Many spare hours he spent, in carving the lid with all manner of
grotesque figures and drawings; and it seemed that hereby he was
striving, in his rude way, to copy parts of the twisted tattooing on
his body. Ant this tattooing had been the work of a departed
prophet and seer of his island, who, by those hieroglyphic marks,
had written out on his body a complete theory of the heavens and the
earth, and a mystical treatise on the art of attaining truth; so
that Queequeg in his own proper person was a riddle to unfold; a
wondrous work in one volume; but whose mysteries not even himself
could read, though his own live heart beat against them; and these
mysteries were therefore destined in the end to moulder away with
the living parchment whereon they were inscribed, and so be unsolved
to the last. And this thought it must have been which
suggested to Ahab that wild exclamation of his, when one morning
turning away from surveying poor Queequeg--"Oh, devilish
tantalization of the gods!"
--Moby
Dick by Herman Melville
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
"We get
up in the bloody morning, and we go to bed at night, and there's
nothing to do. We think we're doing things, making the world
sit up and take notice. We give ourselves heartburn, we're so
busy running up and down, and all the time, nothing. And we're
sick of ourselves. Look into your heart, boy, listen to it.
What does it say to you? What does it show? Nothing.
And that's what you'll learn is there. Say it after me.
Nothing. Say it!"
--Birchwood
by John Banville
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
One
shell would fall in our wire, the next five hundred yards away, the
third on the
parados, the fourth somewhere among the gun positions a mile
behind. One shell bursting on Roscommon Road threw a fragment
two hundred yards which banged against my shin, cutting the puttee,
but doing no other damage. I'd missed a nice
blighty, you might say. This game went on usually from
noon to four o'clock. It was not dangerous, but there is no
more wearying and wearing sound than the distant explosion of a
howitzer and the long threatening whine of the shell as it
approaches.
--A
Passionate Prodigality by Guy Chapman
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
They
are sitting at opposite ends of the old horsehair sofa waiting for
something to happen. A rainy summer night, or is it a rainy
autumn night, smelling of wet leaves. A muffled reedy music
permeates the room like remembered music in which rhythm is blurred.
One by one enormous soft-winged insects fly toward them, or scuttle
above their heads on the ceiling. Several clocks tick in
unison, sounding like a single clock.
--One
Flesh from The Assignation by Joyce Carol Oates
[N.B.:
The above is the entire text of the short story, One Flesh.
When I first read it, I flagged it as an amazing work of
compression, a short-story haiku, as it were. Look, a prose
poem! Now I read it and realize that it exemplifies why Joyce
Carol Oates is a too-productive scribbler who more and more appears
to have dug a literary grave for herself next to the cold, dead and
forgotten body of Hugh Walpole. So, we have here a description
of a dead marriage--two people who are one (rotting) flesh. To
emphasize the two-into-one concept we have the repetition of two
words in each sentence of the story (other than the introductory
one): rainy, music, one and clock. How clever. But
cleverness doesn't buy you immortality--just tenure and an endowed
chair. JCO has so much talent to burn and she squandered it in
academia. She may be the great modern example of why there are
no great modern American writers: they serve as fuel for the smoking
belly of the black god, Scholastica.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
They
fought it, in spite of the blood that every war costs, without the
French Revolution's abominations. Without the guillotine's
horror, without Toulon's and Lyon's and Bordeaux's massacres,
without Vandée's carnages.
They fought it thanks to a piece of paper which along with the need
of the soul, the need of Patria, concretized the sublime idea of
Liberty married to Equality: the Declaration of Independence.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident... That all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain
inalienable rights... That among these are Life, Liberty and the
Pursuit of Happiness... That to secure these rights, governments are
instituted among men...." And this paper that from the French
Revolution on the whole West has copied, from which each of us has
drawn inspiration, still constitutes the backbone of America.
Her vital lymph. Know why? Because it transforms the subjects
into citizens. Because it turns the plebes into people.
Because it invites, no, it orders the plebes turned into citizens to
rebel against tyranny and to govern themselves. To express
their individualities, to search for their own happiness.
--The
Rage and the Pride by Oriana Fallaci
[N.B.:
I thought that on this Tuesday, September 11th, the above might be
an appropriate quote.
Ms.
Fallaci was a best-selling Italian author and journalist who
passed away just about a year ago today. She insisted on
personally translating her Italian prose into English--thus
resulting in the odd sentence fragments and locutions displayed
above. This prose style, though, has a compelling quality
usually lacking in the too-precise twitterings of native writers.
In spite of her maladroit grammatical formulations, it is Ms.
Fallaci's quirkiness in her approach to the English language; her,
perhaps unwitting, "keeping it new," which draws in the reader's
attention. One could do much, much worse than to string
together such fragments. One could bore me--a sin I never
forgive.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Often I
talk to men, of this and that,
Through
the long night, and chiefly through my hat,
And
they, in turn, through hats of different size,
Build
confident assertion on surmise.
So it
continues, hour succeeding hour,
As each
small bud of thought bursts into flower,
While,
listening in limbo, sit the sages,
The
Great Ones of the contemplative ages,
And all
the sons of knowledgeable Man
Who
ever talked since Time itself began--
Listening now, eager to catch one glow
Of
thought not born five thousand years ago,
One
little curtain raised, one tiny pelmet,
one
word not said through some old Roman helmet.
--Philip Stalker
[N.B.: This poem serves as the
frontispiece of sorts for Basil Boothroyd's hilarious book,
Accustomed As I Am: The Loneliness of the Long-Distance Speaker.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Seat thyself sultanically among the moons of
Saturn, and take high abstracted man alone; and he seems a wonder, a
grandeur, and a woe. But from the same point, take mankind in
mass, and for the most part, they seem a mob of unnecessary
duplicates, both contemporary and hereditary.
--Moby Dick by Herman Melville
[N.B.: Only a great prose stylist could
get away with that adverb: "sultanically." It reminds me of a
stray line from Henry Green's Loving: "And Edith looked
out on the morning, the soft bright morning that struck her dazzled
dazzling eyes." Again, only a great master--or a total,
unthinking hack--would stick "dazzled dazzling" together along with
the repetition of the word "morning" in the same short sentence.
Thank goodness for the creative-writing glue factories which squeeze
out such anomalies.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
On Friday morning we were taken round
Versailles by the curator, a young man called Van der Kemp,
previously arranged by A. I was so shy about my bad French
that I could not converse intelligently. I feel desperately
ashamed because when I left Grenoble University in 1927 I spoke like
a bird. Van der Kemp took us not only into the state rooms but
the petits appartements of the Pompadour and du Barry, not
seen by the public. Petits they are, and enchanting.
In Marie Antoinette's boudoir her own clock played tunes for us,
little airs specially composed for it by Mozart, Gluck and others.
The pathos of it. These rooms must be the most exquisite in
the world. In my youth, I used to despise French architecture
for being effeminate and effete. How I dared, contemptible
fool that I was. The prejudices of adolescence make one blush
in remembrance.
--Diaries, 1942-1954
by James Lees-Milne (abridged and introduced by Michael Bloch),
entry for Thursday, 28th April 1949
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
She also did excellent imitations of Sexton,
the Dean in St. Patrick's Church, who gave extraordinary sermons in
a thick Cork accent. Sexton, a big, rough man, did not like
talking about matters of doctrine; he preferred to take his text
from a new movie or a newspaper, and he leaned over the edge of the
pulpit, bawling away in the voice of a market woman. "Dearly
beloved brethren," he cried, "ye all saw it in the paper; the
advertisement for the new film at the Coliseum. Ye all saw
that it was supposed to be 'hot stuff,' and there was nothing in it
at all. That is what I call deceiving the public." I
have a vivid recollection of one of his sermons when an episcopal
ordinance compelled him to preach on the Commandments, Sunday by
Sunday. He was discussing the Second Commandment, and
obviously in agony, because he felt that the Commandments were all
out of date and should be scrapped. "Dearly beloved brethren,"
he began, "of course we're not supposed to take that seriously.
Sure, we all take the Lord's name in vain. I do it myself.
If I lose my temper I say 'Ah, God damn it!' There's no harm
in that at all. What the Commandment means, dearly beloved
brethren, is that we shouldn't be using the Holy Name in public, the
was a lot of people do. You can't go along King Street on
Saturday night without hearing someone using the Holy Name.
That's very bad. At the same time, there isn't any harm in
that either. Sure, half the time people don't be thinking of
what they're saying. But, dearly beloved brethren, if you do
use it, don't use it in front of children. A child's mind is a
delicate thing. A child's mind is like that marble pillar
there (slapping the column beside him). It's smooth, and it
doesn't hold dust nor dirt. One rub of a duster is all you
need to clean that marble. A child's mind is like marble.
Don't roughen it." I thought it the best sermon I had ever
heard, and I liked Sexton and his rough-neck oratory, but neither
Mother nor Minnie could tolerate it. Minnie did a first-class
imitation of him, preaching on the text that "Not a bird shall fall"
and announcing in scandalized tones that it was "all nonsense--my
goodness, they're falling by thousands all over the world every
minute."
--An Only Child by Frank O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Honors for a truly imaginative approach to
their lugubrious wares must go to the vault men. An
advertisement in the 1957 souvenir edition of Mortuary Management
reads:
Deep see fishing off Mexico can't be beat!
When you feel that old tug on your pole and that line goes
whistling into the deep, that's it brother! And, there is
nothing quite like the way I feel about Wilbert burial vaults
either. The combination of a 3/8" pre-cast asphalt inner
liner plus extra-thick, reinforced concrete provides the
essential qualities for a proper burial. My advice to you
is, don't get into "deep water" with burial vaults made of the
new lightweight synthetic substitutes. Just keep "reeling
in" extra profits by continuing to recommend WILBERT burial
vaults....
A two-page spread in a recent issue of the same
magazine presents the reader with this startling thought: "DISINTERMENTS--RARE
BUT REWARDING. It needn't be a problem. It can lead
to repeat business. . . . Prove your wisdom in recommending the
trusted protection of a Clark Metal Grave Vault."
Is a new folklore being created--a specifically
twentieth-century American form of funeral rite which may seem as
outlandish to the rest of the world as the strange burial customs of
the past revealed by anthropological studies?
--St. Peter, Don't You Call Me from
Poison Penmanship by Jessica Mitford
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
'I haven't much advice for you, boy.
Always try to play fair. Nobody likes a sneak, you know the
kind of chap I mean, a bit of a mama's boy, a cissy, always mooning
around the place, always....' He stopped, perhaps realising it
was precisely my type he had described. 'Well anyway, be a
man, learn what life is about. Do the right thing!
That's what I mean. And you won't go wrong.' He lifted a
clinched fist between us and grinned again. I knew what was
coming. 'Grip,' he said softly. 'It's your only
man.'
--Birchwood by John Banville
[N.B.: This comic soliloquy makes
Polonius look positively Solomonic. Don't forget the grip,
young fellers.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Poem
He
lying spilt like water from a bowl
himself the shadow of his own passion
probes
with his secret fingers my terrible
need and sees it is beyond reason.
The
dark head laid like the dreams on a bare pillow
once was dreams only but now stirs
under
my kiss and slowly slowly
he wakes and remembers.
O gifts
his hands are on my happy breasts;
he is all warmth and kindness--
in his
long arms I sleep at last,
and peace is in his kiss.
--by Alison Boodson (March 1946: for J. N.)
[N.B.: See my remarks from yesterday.
This, by the bye, is also why I love old movies--they are actually
much more disturbing and transgressive than modern fare.]
|
|
|
|
Patrick: Lagniappe
Had you stepped on board the Pequod at a
certain juncture of this post-mortemizing of the whale; and had you
strolled forward nigh the windlass, pretty sure am I that you would
have scanned with no small curiosity a very strange, enigmatical
object, which you would have seen there, lying along lengthwise in
the lee scuppers. Not the wondrous cistern in the whale's huge
head; not the prodigy of his unhinged lower jaw; not the miracle of
his symmetrical tail; none of these would so surprise you, as half a
glimpse of that unaccountable cone,--longer than a Kentuckian is
tall, nigh a foot in diameter at the base, and jet black as Yojo,
the ebony idol of Queequeg. And an idol, indeed, it is; or rather,
in old times, its likeness was. Such an idol as that found in
the secret groves of Queen Maachah in Judea; and for worshipping
which, King Asa, her son, did depose her, and destroyed the idol,
and burnt it for an abomination at the brook Kedron, as darkly set
forth in the 15th chapter of the First Book of Kings.
--Moby Dick by Herman Melville
[N.B.: Here's an example of the problem
of explicitness in modern fiction. Can any contemporary
writer, no matter how lubricious, come close to this foulness of
this episode and its heretical implications? You can't be
truly obscene unless you are pushing against something.
Transgression craves taboo. The elimination of one drains the
other of its incantatory power--just so sin cannot exist
except as a blot. Take away sin, and you've taken away most of
what fuels a novel. And that, my friends, is why most modern
fiction is so dull and dreary with the exception of the religious
novelists, usually Catholic, such as Walker Percy, Flannery
O'Connor, Evelyn Waugh, Graham Greene, etc., etc., etc.]
Puff the Magic Maslin
As a continuing, irregular feature named after
one of the premier puffers of our time, Janet Maslin, I offer one in
an unlimited series of bald-faced puffery. Here's the
introductory sentence to the cover
review on today's New York Times Book Review: "Good
morning and please listen to me: Denis Johnson is a true American
artist, and 'Tree of Smoke' is a tremendous book, a strange
entertainment, very long but very fast, a great whirly ride that
starts out sad and gets sadder and sadder, loops unpredictably out
and around, and then lurches down so suddenly at the very end that
it will make your stomach flop." Only the likes of Raymond
Chandler have a license to write such purple prose. Great
whirly ride, indeed. Thanks for the tip mister. Anyone
who writes that badly doesn't know a spinnaker from a sphincter.
|
|
|
|
|